Why It's Not Possible to 'Drain the Swamp'
Secure Wealth and Military Power
Fast forward almost 225 years later and who are the people running the government? Well, minus the slave owners, they are the well-educated lawyers and wealthy who stand to gain the most from what the government does. So when you look at the big picture, not much has changed since the first government was created. Well-educated, lawyers and wealthy people who suffer from human nature and are constantly tempted with deeds of corruption each day.So imagine what would happen if you actually tried to "drain the swamp" as people who are unaware of how the powerful and wealthy stay powerful and wealthy. First off, you would not be able to eradicate them all in one day. Just like it takes years to get them into office, it takes years to get them out of office. Even if you could pass legislation tomorrow that every city, county, state, and federal government position could only be served by a one-term candidate, you still would have one basic problem you will never be able to overcome.During the term where they are all going to leave, you will have all the ones running for office who are going to fill those vacancies. The supposed "clean swamp fillers." All it takes is one closed-door meeting for the people in power to meet with the people who will fill their positions to inform them of the way government really works. Then, on the day the swamp is supposedly being cleaned, all you have done is replace the dirty swamp people with a new group of dirty swamp people. The only thing that makes it difficult to believe or comprehend is that such large groups of people could so effectively and so efficiently run the largest conspiracy on the planet right in front of everyone's eyes without ever being detected.Hermann Goering said it best:
“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship…
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
It has been working this way since the first government was created. It has worked this way in every government that has ever been created. It will work this way in every government that will ever be created.If you can't see it then you just don't want to. It couldn't be more obvious.
About the Creator
Richard Van Steenberg
HETs live among us
CTVs vectate above us
ET is at war with EA to validate their Inslavement
Sign the ExtraTerrestrialDisclosurePetition.com
Keep reading
More stories from Richard Van Steenberg and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Why Black History Matters in America?
The United States of America is celebrating their 250th anniversary in 2026. I'm proud to be an American and as someone who was born here, I wouldn't imagine myself living anywhere else. This is a country where opportunities are possible. Where anyone can be successful in anything they desire to do. Equality, community, and togetherness are the backbones of what America is and should be about. However, we have an administration who wants to erase and disregard those who have made positive, meaningful impacts in our country, specifically Black figures, such as Martin Luther King, Jr., Rosa Parks, and Maya Angelou. President Trump and his administration have been constantly complaining and fighting against what they call the "Woke agenda". They use this excuse as a distraction from other issues they refuse to address, such as the high cost of living, climate change, and inflation. That equality is dividing America, when in reality, it's bringing us together. Being woke is not tied to a specific political party. No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, you can still care about other people and their plights. Compassion and empathy for others isn't tied to a political party, either. We were taught as children to treat others the way we want to be treated and not judge others because they're different from us. Caring about others isn't a personal attack on your beliefs. It doesn't make you any less of a person. People who are easily offended over African American figures, past or present, or anything related to it, are grasping at straws. Current and future generations need to know who people like Harriet Tubman and Shirley Chisholm were, especially in the classroom. Black History is part of American History. It should be recognized, not hidden or forgotten. Besides, you can't shield children from everything, just because your feelings are easily hurt.
By Mark Wesley Pritchard 4 days ago in The Swamp
Another Popular Port Mulls Cruise Ship Ban
A major tourist port is considering a ban on large cruise ships, reigniting a global debate over the environmental, economic, and social impact of mass tourism. Local authorities say the proposal is aimed at protecting fragile coastal ecosystems and easing pressure on overcrowded city infrastructure, but the move has drawn criticism from cruise operators and businesses that rely on visitor spending. The port, which welcomes hundreds of thousands of cruise passengers each year, has become the latest destination to reassess its relationship with the booming cruise industry. Officials confirmed that a formal review is underway to determine whether restrictions or an outright ban on cruise vessels should be introduced within the next two years. Growing Concerns Over Overcrowding Residents and environmental groups have long complained that cruise tourism brings more disruption than benefit. On peak days, several ships can arrive simultaneously, unloading thousands of passengers into narrow streets and historic districts within hours. “The city becomes unlivable when the ships come in,” said a local shop owner who supports the ban. “Public transport is overwhelmed, waste increases, and emergency services struggle to cope.” Urban planners say cruise tourism differs from other forms of travel because it concentrates visitors into short time windows. Unlike hotel guests who stay for several days, cruise passengers often spend only a few hours in port, limiting their economic contribution while still placing heavy demands on public services. A municipal report found that cruise ship arrivals accounted for nearly 40 percent of daily tourist traffic during the summer months, contributing significantly to congestion, air pollution, and rising rents in nearby neighborhoods. Environmental Impact in Focus Environmental concerns are central to the proposal. Cruise ships burn large quantities of marine fuel and emit sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and fine particles that affect air quality. They also generate wastewater and solid waste that can harm marine ecosystems if not carefully managed. Marine biologists warn that coral reefs and coastal habitats near the port are already under stress from rising sea temperatures and pollution. “Adding thousands of tons of emissions and waste every season only accelerates the damage,” said one environmental researcher. Studies commissioned by the local government found that a single cruise ship can emit as much particulate pollution in one day as tens of thousands of cars. The report concluded that limiting or banning cruise traffic would significantly improve air quality in surrounding residential areas. Economic Divisions The proposal has exposed deep divisions within the business community. Hotel owners, tour guides, and souvenir vendors argue that cruise passengers bring vital income and support thousands of jobs. “A ban would be devastating,” said a representative of the tourism chamber. “Cruise visitors may stay for a short time, but collectively they spend millions each year on excursions, restaurants, and local products.” However, critics counter that much of the money goes back to cruise companies rather than local businesses. Passengers often eat and sleep on board, reducing spending in the city. Some tour operators are contracted directly by cruise lines, leaving smaller independent businesses struggling to compete. An economic impact assessment showed that cruise tourism accounted for less than 8 percent of overall tourism revenue while contributing disproportionately to congestion and infrastructure costs. Lessons From Other Cities The debate mirrors similar moves in other global destinations. Venice banned large cruise ships from its historic lagoon, citing damage to fragile foundations and environmental risks. Amsterdam recently announced plans to restrict cruise arrivals as part of efforts to curb mass tourism and reduce emissions. “These decisions show a shift in how cities think about tourism,” said a policy analyst specializing in urban sustainability. “The focus is moving from volume to value—fewer visitors who stay longer and spend more responsibly.” Supporters of the ban argue that the port can reposition itself as a destination for eco-tourism and cultural travel rather than mass cruise traffic. They say investments in rail links, small-scale ferries, and longer-stay tourism could create a more balanced and sustainable economy. Political Pressure Builds The proposal is expected to be debated in the city council later this year. Several council members have voiced support for strict limits on cruise ships, while others warn of legal challenges from shipping companies. Cruise operators have already signaled they may contest any ban, arguing that ports benefit from long-term contracts and infrastructure investments made by the industry. In a statement, one major cruise line said it was “committed to working with local authorities to reduce environmental impact through cleaner fuels and improved waste management.” The company added that banning ships would harm workers and reduce tourism competitiveness. Meanwhile, citizen groups have begun organizing protests and petitions calling for decisive action. One campaign group gathered more than 50,000 signatures in support of a ban within weeks. “This is about our right to clean air and livable streets,” said an organizer. “Tourism should not come at the cost of our health.” What Happens Next Officials say several options are under review, including limiting the number of ships per day, banning vessels above a certain size, or imposing higher environmental fees. A complete ban remains one of several scenarios under consideration. The port authority plans to publish its final recommendations after consulting residents, businesses, and environmental experts. A decision is expected by early next year. A Turning Point for Cruise Tourism The case reflects a broader reckoning for the cruise industry, which has rebounded strongly after the pandemic and is expanding its global fleet. Yet as ships grow larger and cities grow more crowded, resistance is mounting. For the port now considering a ban, the choice will shape its future identity—either as a hub for mass tourism or as a model for sustainable travel. “The question is not whether tourism should exist,” said one city planner. “It is what kind of tourism we want.” As communities worldwide confront the pressures of climate change and overcrowding, the debate over cruise ships is likely to intensify. Whether this port joins others in closing its doors to large vessels may signal a turning point in how destinations balance economic gain with environmental responsibility and quality of life.
By Fiaz Ahmed Brohiabout 23 hours ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.