social media

Social Media for modern lovers in the digital age.

The Department of Non Education
You are scrolling through a feed, and see a question on the top of the post. We queried one hundred college students. Out of curiosity, you want to know what they asked our young educated kids. It’s a simple question really. What year what the Declaration of Independence?
By Alexandra Grantabout 17 hours ago in Humans
What the System Forces You to Become
The Question the System Replaces By the time a person has passed through employment law, healthcare coverage rules, unemployment insurance, disability determination, and benefit eligibility, the relevant question has already shifted without ever being stated out loud. It is no longer whether the system helped or failed them. It is whether they managed to remain legible long enough to survive it. Each institutional layer imposes requirements that appear reasonable when viewed in isolation, yet become coercive when experienced sequentially:
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcasta day ago in Humans
Catching Fish
Anyone who fishes, knows, there is an art to catching fish. You need the right environment and weather, the right, bait or lure, and a bit of wisdom and finesse, in the way you cast out. It’s an art really. Not everyone can catch fish, and be good at it. Then there is the whole question of ethics.
By Alexandra Grant2 days ago in Humans
Forgiveness Is Not a Prerequisite for Healing
There is a persistent cultural belief often framed as callow wisdom that forgiveness is necessary for healing. Survivors are told that to move forward, they must “let go,” “make peace,” or forgive those who have harmed them. This belief is not only inaccurate; for many survivors but it is also actively harmful.
By Cadma2 days ago in Humans
Just start by forgiving and forgetting
How many times have you heard the words forgive and forget? As far back as I can remember, my mother (God rest her soul) always talked about forgiveness that it is important because it is what our Lord and savior Jesus Christ did for those who betrayed him to be honest I have a real difficulty trying to forgive I mean it's so easy you let go of the hate you let go of the hurt that has been inside your heart your head your soul and you're able to move on I've seen people do it I've heard people talk about how they can just easily forgive those who have betrayed them I have a real difficulty trying to forgive especially those who stabbed me in the back betrayed me and figuratively speaking just left out to die. I have so many former friends that I hold so much hatred towards them, and I don't wanna hold it anymore. I try to let it go, I try to move on, but out of nowhere those memories just come back, and they ignite that fire that I thought I put out.
By stephanie borges2 days ago in Humans
The One Habit That Quietly Changed My Entire Life
There are many habits people talk about waking up at 5 AM, journaling, meditation, exercising daily, reading books, cold showers, and more. I tried many of them. Some worked, some didn’t. But there is one habit that quietly changed my entire life, and surprisingly, it is not something dramatic or trendy.
By Sathish Kumar 2 days ago in Humans
The Color Line Within the Color Line
Colorism is often described as a preference for lighter skin within communities of color. Yet this definition, while accurate, is incomplete. Colorism is not merely an aesthetic bias or cultural quirk. It is a social technology one that developed within colonial and racial hierarchies to maintain systems of white supremacy without constant direct enforcement. At its core, colorism is a structure that rewards proximity to whiteness and punishes distance from it. It operates through psychological conditioning, social incentives, and internalized hierarchies. Over time, it becomes self-sustaining: communities begin to reproduce the same divisions that were originally imposed upon them.
By Cadma2 days ago in Humans
Gen Z Is No Longer Getting their Driver’s License
For decades, learning how to drive was a rite of passage. Turning 16 meant freedom, independence, and your first taste of adulthood behind the wheel. But something has shifted. A growing number of young people — especially Gen Z — are delaying getting their driver’s licenses or skipping it entirely. Instead, they’re tapping a screen, booking an Uber, and letting someone else handle the road.
By Anthony Bahamonde3 days ago in Humans
The Power of Indifference
It is fascinating how some people dedicate so much energy to watching, commenting, and reacting to the lives of others. They laugh at small missteps, analyze routine actions, and find entertainment in the discomfort or mistakes of others. In many communities, workplaces, and social circles, this behavior can feel normal or even encouraged. It becomes a subtle culture of observation and commentary that most people do not even realize they are participating.
By Eunice Kamau3 days ago in Humans
Maxwell Refuses to Testify Before Congress: What This Means for the Epstein Investigation. AI-Generated.
Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted associate of Jeffrey Epstein, has officially refused to answer questions during her congressional deposition, according to her legal team. The news has reignited public interest and political debate, highlighting the ongoing tension between constitutional rights and the pursuit of transparency in one of the most high-profile criminal cases in recent U.S. history. Maxwell, a British socialite convicted in 2021 of charges related to assisting Epstein in the sexual abuse of underage girls, is currently serving a 20-year federal prison sentence. Despite her conviction, Congress had scheduled a deposition to gather information about Epstein’s network, how government officials handled related cases, and whether other high-profile figures were involved. However, her lawyers confirmed that she will invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, refusing to answer any substantive questions. The Legal Strategy Behind Maxwell’s Silence The Fifth Amendment is a constitutional protection that allows individuals to refuse to answer questions that could incriminate them. Maxwell’s attorneys argue that answering questions before Congress could jeopardize her ongoing legal interests and expose her to further criminal liability. While some see this as a tactical decision to protect her legal position, others view it as an obstacle to accountability and transparency. Interestingly, in previous discussions with the Department of Justice, Maxwell did not invoke the Fifth Amendment when answering questions, which makes this sudden refusal noteworthy. Lawmakers and legal analysts speculate that her team is being extra cautious given the high stakes, the public scrutiny, and the possibility of future legal challenges. Her lawyers have also stated that participating in a congressional deposition could be more about public spectacle than meaningful oversight. What Congress Hoped to Learn The House Oversight Committee intended Maxwell’s testimony to shed light on several critical issues, including Epstein’s financial and social networks, government handling of his cases, and potential complicity by other well-connected individuals. Investigators hoped she could clarify the role of non-prosecution agreements, internal DOJ decisions, and the activities of Epstein’s associates. Committee members on both sides of the aisle have expressed frustration. Democrats emphasize the need for accountability and full transparency, while Republicans stress the public’s right to understand how the case was handled and whether any powerful figures were involved. The absence of her testimony leaves a gap in the investigation, though lawmakers can still pursue other avenues, such as document reviews and testimony from other witnesses. Ongoing Fallout from Epstein’s Crimes While Maxwell remains silent, the broader Epstein investigation continues to make headlines. Recent releases of millions of internal documents have intensified public scrutiny and renewed calls for answers. Maxwell’s refusal to answer questions has amplified debate over whether justice is achievable when key witnesses invoke constitutional protections. The public reaction has been divided. Many citizens express frustration, feeling that Maxwell’s silence prevents closure for Epstein’s victims and hinders Congress’s ability to hold others accountable. At the same time, legal experts defend her decision as a legitimate exercise of constitutional rights, emphasizing that invoking the Fifth Amendment is common in complex, high-stakes cases where self-incrimination is a risk. Political and Legal Implications Maxwell’s decision comes at a politically sensitive time. Congress is actively investigating the Epstein network, and there is pressure to uncover whether government officials, wealthy elites, or international figures were involved. The deposition was expected to provide critical insights, yet her refusal highlights the limitations of congressional authority when individuals assert constitutional rights. Some experts argue that Maxwell’s silence will not prevent Congress from continuing its work. Committees can review documents, interview other witnesses, and issue subpoenas to gather additional information. Others note that while the Fifth Amendment protects her from self-incrimination, it also complicates efforts to hold influential figures accountable and may limit public understanding of Epstein’s network. The Broader Context of Oversight and Accountability Maxwell’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment underscores a broader tension in U.S. governance: balancing individual legal protections with the public’s demand for transparency and accountability. Lawmakers rely on witness testimony to piece together complex cases, yet legal rights prevent them from compelling answers in situations that could expose witnesses to criminal liability. This balance is especially challenging in cases involving high-profile individuals with global connections. Epstein’s case involved not only serious crimes but also networks spanning multiple countries, making comprehensive investigation and accountability extremely difficult. Maxwell’s silence, while legally justified, leaves many questions unanswered and illustrates the inherent challenges of oversight in high-profile criminal matters. Looking Ahead Even without Maxwell’s testimony, Congress can continue to pursue its investigation. Document reviews, interviews with other witnesses, and further examination of previously released evidence will remain central to lawmakers’ efforts. Future hearings may involve other figures connected to Epstein, some of whom have already agreed to provide closed-door testimony. Meanwhile, public interest in the case remains high. Victims, advocates, and citizens continue to demand transparency and accountability, emphasizing the importance of congressional oversight and the role of the media in keeping the issue in the spotlight. Maxwell’s silence may complicate the process, but it has not diminished the broader push for justice and reform. Conclusion Ghislaine Maxwell’s refusal to answer questions from Congress highlights the tension between constitutional rights and the pursuit of transparency in high-profile criminal cases. While her decision protects her legal interests, it also leaves gaps in the understanding of Epstein’s network and the government’s response. As lawmakers continue their investigation, the public remains engaged and vigilant. Maxwell’s silence may frustrate many, but it also reinforces the importance of balancing legal protections with the demands of accountability. In the end, this development underscores that the pursuit of justice, particularly in cases involving powerful individuals, is complex, multifaceted, and ongoing.
By Abid Ali3 days ago in Humans
Maxwell Won’t Answer Questions From Congress, Lawyer Says. AI-Generated.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s refusal to answer questions from Congress, as confirmed by her lawyer, has reignited public debate over accountability in one of the most disturbing abuse scandals of modern times. The decision has drawn sharp reactions from lawmakers, survivors’ advocates, and the public, many of whom see her silence as another barrier to uncovering the full truth behind Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network.
By Ayesha Lashari3 days ago in Humans
Keon and Kavon Herbert. AI-Generated.
Keon Gerard Herbert and Kavon Sherard Herbert are twin brothers from Hampton, Virginia who have gradually built an online presence through humor, fashion, and everyday moments shared on social media. Over time, their content has attracted a steady audience across platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok, where followers engage with their photos, short videos, and personality-driven posts.
By Kavon Herbert4 days ago in Humans