technology
Talking tech; debates about regulating technology, privacy laws, piracy, and the pitfalls of AI.
Why Your Power Bill Is Spiking Faster Than a Nearby Data Center’s. AI-Generated.
If you’ve recently opened your electricity bill and felt a pang of disbelief, you’re not alone. Many households across the country are seeing energy costs climb at rates that seem almost unfair—sometimes even faster than the colossal power consumption of nearby data centers, those tech giants quietly humming away in sprawling facilities. But why is this happening? And what does it say about the way energy is generated, distributed, and consumed in today’s world? The Energy Paradox: Households vs. Data Centers At first glance, the comparison seems absurd. A typical household uses, on average, 877 kWh per month, while a large data center can consume millions of kilowatt-hours. Yet, in recent months, some families report year-over-year electricity increases of 20–30%, even as data centers operating nearby see relatively smaller percentage jumps in costs. The reason lies in a combination of systemic energy economics, infrastructure, and policy trends. Transmission Costs and the Hidden Infrastructure Burden One major factor behind surging residential energy bills is the cost of transmission. Electricity doesn’t magically appear in your home—it travels through a vast network of power lines, substations, and transformers. Maintaining and upgrading this infrastructure is expensive. Utilities often pass these costs directly onto consumers, which means households bear the brunt of price spikes even if overall electricity generation costs remain steady. Data centers, by contrast, frequently negotiate long-term energy contracts at fixed rates with utilities, giving them a buffer against short-term fluctuations. Some even invest in private power sources like solar arrays or cogeneration systems, further insulating themselves from rising energy prices. Peak Demand and Time-of-Use Pricing Residential energy bills are also impacted by the timing of consumption. Utilities increasingly adopt time-of-use pricing, where electricity costs more during periods of peak demand—typically hot afternoons when air conditioners are blasting. Households often face these peak rates without realizing it. Data centers, on the other hand, often operate around the clock and can shift workloads to off-peak hours or leverage battery storage to minimize costs during high-rate periods. Essentially, your household is paying a premium for energy at the moments you most need it, while tech companies optimize consumption strategically. Supply Chain Pressures and Fuel Costs Another invisible driver of rising bills is the cost of fuel used in power generation. Even if your electricity comes from a grid mix including renewable sources, the price of natural gas, coal, and oil can influence overall rates. Geopolitical instability, market speculation, and inflationary pressures on commodities all contribute. Meanwhile, large energy consumers like data centers can sometimes secure favorable fuel hedges or participate in demand response programs that allow them to scale back usage during high-cost periods, giving them a financial edge over the average household. Renewable Energy Transition and Short-Term Pain The transition to renewable energy is critical for combating climate change but comes with transitional costs. Integrating wind, solar, and other renewables into the grid requires new infrastructure, backup systems for intermittent sources, and sometimes higher short-term tariffs. These costs are often reflected more sharply in residential bills, whereas large commercial consumers may benefit from renewable energy credits, tax incentives, or off-site renewable energy contracts. Regulatory Policies and Local Variations Energy pricing is not uniform. State and municipal regulations, taxes, and fees can dramatically impact your bill. Areas with aggressive clean energy mandates or carbon pricing may see residential bills spike faster than industrial rates. Utilities frequently argue that households are easier targets for rate adjustments than massive corporations with political influence. Behavioral and Lifestyle Factors It’s not all systemic—behavioral factors also matter. A family running multiple appliances during peak hours, leaving lights on, or using old HVAC systems may see bills that rise faster than expected. Meanwhile, data centers invest heavily in energy-efficient cooling, virtualization, and AI-powered workload management, making their energy usage highly optimized despite massive absolute consumption. Why It Feels Personal When your bill spikes while a nearby data center quietly hums along, it can feel like an unfair imbalance. But the reality is that energy economics are complex, combining infrastructure costs, fuel markets, policy decisions, and consumption patterns. Households often bear the visible brunt of price changes, while large commercial operations leverage scale, contracts, and technology to shield themselves. What You Can Do While the macro-level drivers of rising energy bills may be out of your control, there are still steps you can take: Audit Your Energy Use: Identify appliances and habits that drive up peak demand and consider energy-efficient replacements. Shift Usage: Move high-consumption tasks to off-peak hours if your utility offers time-of-use pricing. Invest in Smart Technology: Programmable thermostats, smart plugs, and energy monitoring systems can make a measurable difference. Explore Renewable Options: Even small rooftop solar installations or community solar subscriptions can reduce dependency on the grid. Advocate for Fair Pricing: Participate in local energy forums and support policies that balance residential and commercial energy costs. The Bigger Picture The rising gap between household energy bills and data center costs highlights a broader reality: modern energy systems are optimized for scale, not necessarily fairness. Data centers, with their multi-million-dollar infrastructure, long-term contracts, and energy efficiency investments, can buffer themselves against volatility. Households, by contrast, absorb the short-term shocks of grid maintenance, fuel price swings, and regulatory transitions. Understanding why your power bill spikes faster than a nearby data center is the first step toward regaining control. It’s not just about personal consumption—it’s about recognizing the larger forces at play and taking strategic actions to protect yourself from the next surge.
By Muhammad Hassan28 days ago in The Swamp
US Senators Move to Clarify the Crypto Landscape. AI-Generated.
The U.S. cryptocurrency market has long been a frontier of innovation — and confusion. Investors, startups, and regulators alike have struggled to navigate a landscape where digital assets grow at lightning speed, yet the rules governing them remain murky. Now, a group of U.S. senators has taken a major step to address this uncertainty by introducing a bill aimed at defining clearer rules for the crypto market. A Turning Point for Crypto Regulation For years, the U.S. has lagged behind other countries in providing clear legal guidance on cryptocurrency. While some states have issued their own regulations and agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have offered guidance, the lack of a unified federal framework has created uncertainty. This uncertainty has affected everyone from small retail investors to large financial institutions, limiting adoption and innovation. The new bill, introduced by senators from both parties, represents the first comprehensive attempt in years to outline federal rules for digital assets. By clearly defining what constitutes a cryptocurrency, setting standards for trading platforms, and delineating regulatory oversight, lawmakers hope to bring stability and transparency to the market. Key Provisions of the Bill While the full text of the legislation is extensive, several provisions stand out as particularly significant: Clear Definitions: One of the major obstacles in the U.S. crypto market has been the lack of precise definitions. The bill seeks to categorize digital assets into clear categories such as “cryptocurrencies,” “stablecoins,” and “security tokens,” each with tailored regulatory frameworks. This clarity is expected to help companies understand whether they are subject to SEC rules, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) oversight, or other federal regulations. Consumer Protections: With high-profile cases of crypto fraud and exchange collapses, consumer protection is a priority. The bill introduces requirements for transparency in trading platforms, clear disclosure of risks, and security standards to protect investor assets. It also provides mechanisms for recourse in cases of fraud or mismanagement. Stablecoin Oversight: Stablecoins — digital assets pegged to traditional currencies — have grown enormously, fueling concerns about systemic risk. The proposed legislation outlines regulatory guidelines to ensure that stablecoins are fully backed, audited regularly, and subject to federal oversight, reducing the potential for market disruptions. Innovation-Friendly Framework: Importantly, the bill does not aim to stifle innovation. It encourages technological development and allows startups to experiment within a defined framework. Lawmakers recognize that the U.S. risks losing its competitive edge if crypto regulation becomes too restrictive or unclear. Coordination Among Agencies: One persistent problem has been overlapping jurisdiction between federal agencies. The bill seeks to clarify which agency is responsible for different types of digital assets and activities, aiming to reduce confusion and prevent conflicting enforcement actions. Bipartisan Support Reflects Growing Recognition Interestingly, the bill enjoys support from both Democrats and Republicans, reflecting a growing recognition that cryptocurrency is not just a niche technology but a key component of the modern financial system. Lawmakers have highlighted the potential for blockchain to improve payment systems, reduce transaction costs, and enhance transparency in financial markets. The bipartisan nature of the legislation may also increase its chances of passage, though challenges remain. While regulators largely welcome clarity, some consumer advocacy groups argue that the bill does not go far enough in protecting everyday investors from risks associated with highly volatile digital assets. Industry Response The crypto industry has largely welcomed the proposed legislation, viewing it as a long-overdue step toward legitimacy. Exchanges, wallet providers, and blockchain startups have repeatedly called for clear federal guidelines, arguing that uncertainty hampers growth and scares away institutional investors. At the same time, some companies have cautioned that overly strict rules could push innovation overseas, as U.S. developers might move to countries with more flexible frameworks. Balancing innovation with investor protection remains a central challenge for lawmakers. Global Context: The U.S. and Crypto Regulation The introduction of this bill comes at a time when the U.S. faces increasing international competition in the crypto space. Countries like Switzerland, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates have implemented comprehensive frameworks that attract crypto startups and investments. Without clear rules, the U.S. risks losing its leadership position in a market expected to be worth trillions of dollars in the coming decades. By setting federal standards, the bill could help the U.S. reassert its influence, ensuring that innovation occurs under a framework that protects consumers while fostering growth. Analysts believe that clarity in regulation will encourage major banks, investment firms, and technology companies to expand their involvement in digital assets. Next Steps and Potential Challenges The bill will now move through the Senate committee process, where lawmakers will debate its provisions and consider amendments. It faces potential hurdles, including disagreements over the scope of regulatory authority and the degree of oversight needed for innovative financial instruments. Moreover, the fast-moving nature of the crypto market presents another challenge: laws that take too long to pass risk becoming outdated as technology evolves. Advocates argue that any legislation should include mechanisms for periodic review to keep pace with innovation. Conclusion: Toward a Clearer Crypto Future For investors, innovators, and regulators, the introduction of this bill represents a significant milestone. It signals a shift toward clearer rules, stronger protections, and a more stable environment for digital assets in the United States. While challenges remain, the legislation offers hope that the long-standing uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulation may finally be addressed. As Congress debates the bill, the broader market watches closely. A well-crafted framework could transform the U.S. crypto landscape, encouraging growth, innovation, and consumer confidence. Ultimately, the success of this effort may determine whether America can maintain its position as a global leader in the digital financial revolution.
By Muhammad Hassan29 days ago in The Swamp
Trump Says Microsoft Will Pay More for Its Datacenters’ Electricity. AI-Generated.
When it comes to energy, politics, and Big Tech, things just got interesting. President Donald Trump recently announced that Microsoft will pay more for the electricity used by its massive datacenters, a statement that has stirred debate from boardrooms to living rooms. The move highlights a growing tension: how do we balance America’s technological growth, particularly in artificial intelligence, with rising energy costs for everyday people? Let’s unpack what’s happening, why it matters, and what it could mean for communities, companies, and consumers alike. Datacenters Are Hungry for Power Datacenters are the backbone of cloud computing and AI development. These massive facilities store and process the data that powers everything from your video calls to advanced AI programs. And all that processing requires energy — lots of it. In fact, some datacenters use as much electricity as a small city. With AI workloads growing exponentially, electricity consumption in these centers could double by the mid‑2020s. That’s not just a tech problem — it affects local electricity grids, utility rates, and environmental resources. Trump’s announcement reflects a broader concern: he wants ordinary Americans to avoid paying higher utility bills just because tech companies need more power. Why Microsoft’s Response Matters Microsoft didn’t push back. Instead, the company unveiled its “Community-First AI Infrastructure” plan, aimed at addressing energy concerns while continuing its AI expansion. The plan includes: Paying electricity rates that cover the full cost of their datacenters. Working with local utilities and regulators to support grid improvements. Investing in job creation and AI training in host communities. Reducing environmental impacts, including water usage. Paying full property taxes without requesting incentives. In short, Microsoft is trying to show that it’s willing to internalize its energy costs rather than let local communities shoulder the burden. The Political Angle This announcement is more than just corporate strategy — it’s political theater. With voters concerned about rising costs and inflation, Trump is signaling that his administration is protecting consumers from the hidden costs of AI infrastructure. However, critics warn that forcing tech companies to pay higher electricity bills could slow investment in U.S. datacenters. Some clean energy advocates also argue that expanding renewable energy capacity is a more effective solution than simply redistributing costs. The debate shows that AI isn’t just a technological revolution — it’s also reshaping energy policy, economics, and local politics. Community Reactions People living near datacenters have had mixed reactions. Some welcome the news, hoping that higher corporate contributions will prevent electricity bills from climbing. Others remain skeptical, worried that new projects might still strain local resources or that energy-intensive operations could continue despite higher costs. Communities in states like Wisconsin and Virginia have already pushed back against new datacenters, citing water usage, environmental concerns, and electricity demand. Microsoft’s commitments aim to reassure local residents and reduce community resistance — but whether it works remains to be seen. Broader Implications for the Tech Industry If Microsoft’s plan is successful, it could set a new standard for the entire tech industry. Other companies, like Amazon, Google, and Meta, may follow suit, paying closer attention to electricity costs, local infrastructure, and community relations. This could encourage more sustainable datacenter development, better corporate accountability, and even influence where AI infrastructure is built in the future. AI, Energy, and the Future of Policy The Trump-Microsoft electricity issue is more than a headline. It’s a window into how AI, energy consumption, and public policy intersect. Datacenters are no longer invisible infrastructure — their energy needs have direct economic, social, and environmental impacts. By calling on Microsoft to pay more, Trump has spotlighted the challenges of maintaining rapid AI growth while protecting consumers. And Microsoft’s “Community-First” plan shows one way a tech giant can respond: balancing expansion with responsibility. Conclusion: Powering Technology Without Powering Up Costs At the heart of this story is a simple question: how do we ensure AI innovation doesn’t come at the expense of everyday Americans? Trump’s directive and Microsoft’s response offer one potential path forward: let tech companies cover their own energy costs, invest in communities, and reduce environmental impacts. Whether this model becomes the industry standard remains to be seen. For now, it’s a clear reminder that the future of AI isn’t just about algorithms and servers — it’s about people, power, and policy.
By Muhammad Hassan29 days ago in The Swamp
Russian Oil Company Refuses to Relinquish Control of Venezuela Exports. AI-Generated.
Venezuela’s oil saga just got even more intense. In early 2026, a dramatic confrontation between superpowers took center stage: a Russian oil company has refused to relinquish control of Venezuelan oil exports, directly challenging U.S. ambitions in the region. This isn’t just a business dispute; it’s a story of geopolitics, national sovereignty, and global influence that is reshaping energy markets and international diplomacy. For decades, Venezuela has been one of the world’s top oil producers, with reserves that rival those of Saudi Arabia. Control over these reserves doesn’t just mean profits — it signifies leverage, influence, and a critical role in global energy security. When Russia’s state-owned Roszarubezhneft declared it would maintain control over Venezuelan oil operations, it sent a clear message: Moscow isn’t backing down, no matter the pressure from Washington. Russia vs. U.S.: The Clash Over Venezuelan Oil In January 2026, following political upheaval in Venezuela — including the capture of its president by U.S. forces — the Trump administration announced plans to assert control over Venezuela’s oil exports. The aim was clear: integrate Venezuelan crude into U.S. markets, reduce the influence of adversarial powers, and stabilize energy flows favorable to U.S. interests. However, Russia’s Roszarubezhneft, a fully state-owned company, refused to comply. According to official statements, the Venezuelan oil assets are legally Russian, and the company will continue operations alongside Venezuela’s state-owned PDVSA (Petróleos de Venezuela SA). This refusal isn’t just about business — it’s a geopolitical power play, signaling Moscow’s intent to maintain influence in the Western Hemisphere. The standoff is more than a territorial or commercial dispute. It underscores a larger strategic battle over energy control, sovereignty, and the balance of power between the U.S. and Russia. Venezuela, with its vast reserves and strategic location, has become a key chess piece in this global game. Why Venezuela’s Oil Matters Venezuela holds some of the largest proven oil reserves on the planet, estimated at more than 300 billion barrels. Oil exports are the backbone of its economy, and control over these exports means influence over global energy markets. Yet, Venezuela’s oil sector has been plagued by decades of mismanagement, political instability, and international sanctions, leaving PDVSA struggling to maintain production levels. This created a window of opportunity for Russia. Over the past two decades, Moscow built deep energy ties with Caracas, stepping in when Western oil companies either pulled out or faced sanctions. Initially, Rosneft — Russia’s largest oil producer — managed these assets. However, after sanctions limited Rosneft’s ability to trade Venezuelan oil internationally, many of the assets were transferred to Roszarubezhneft, cementing full Russian state control. By maintaining this presence, Russia ensures it retains a strategic foothold in one of the richest oil basins in the world. A Geopolitical Statement, Not Just Business Roszarubezhneft’s refusal isn’t merely about oil production; it’s a bold geopolitical signal. By asserting control, Russia is challenging the idea that the U.S. can unilaterally dictate outcomes in the Americas. It’s also a demonstration of Moscow’s broader foreign policy approach: energy is as much about politics and influence as it is about commerce. For Washington, this represents a challenge. The U.S. strategy aimed to curtail adversarial influence near its borders while potentially opening the door for U.S.-aligned oil companies to enter the Venezuelan market. But Moscow’s defiance complicates that plan, raising tensions and increasing the likelihood of sanctions, economic maneuvers, and diplomatic clashes. Global Implications The repercussions of this standoff extend far beyond Venezuela: Russian Presence in the Americas: Traditionally, the U.S. has dominated Latin America. Russia’s continued involvement in Venezuela challenges this influence, signaling a shift toward a more multipolar world where energy resources can dictate power dynamics. Rising U.S.–Russia Tensions: The dispute adds fuel to an already tense relationship between the two nations. Both sides could escalate economic or diplomatic measures, further complicating the global political landscape. Market Uncertainty: Oil markets thrive on predictability. When control over a key supply region like Venezuela is contested, traders face uncertainty. This can lead to volatility in global oil prices, affecting consumers and businesses worldwide. Questions of Sovereignty: Central to this debate is the question of who really controls Venezuela’s natural resources. With the country’s government fragmented and foreign powers vying for influence, the issue of sovereignty becomes murky, highlighting the intersection of domestic politics and international intervention. The Human and Economic Angle While international headlines focus on geopolitics, the Venezuelan people feel the real-world consequences. Economic instability, hyperinflation, and scarcity of essential goods have plagued the nation for years. The contest over oil exports has a direct impact on Venezuela’s recovery prospects. If the sector remains under contested control, it could slow investment, delay infrastructure projects, and limit the revenue needed for social programs and economic stabilization. Meanwhile, Russian involvement, while strategic for Moscow, brings limited immediate relief to Venezuelans, illustrating how global power struggles often unfold at the expense of ordinary citizens. What’s Next? The situation in Venezuela is still evolving. The standoff between Russia and the U.S. over oil exports could take many forms: diplomatic negotiations, economic sanctions, or shifts in domestic Venezuelan politics. Global energy markets, investors, and policymakers will be watching closely. One thing is certain: in the world of oil, nothing is just business anymore. Energy resources have become instruments of power, leverage, and influence, shaping alliances and rivalries alike. Russia’s refusal to relinquish control of Venezuelan oil is a clear reminder that oil isn’t just a commodity — it’s a geopolitical weapon. As the story develops, the stakes will only rise. Whether through market pressures, international diplomacy, or changes within Venezuela itself, this battle over oil control will continue to make headlines, influence global energy flows, and reshape international relations.
By Muhammad Hassan29 days ago in The Swamp
Cold Weather and Data Centres Drive Up US Greenhouse Gas Emissions. AI-Generated.
As the United States endures one of the coldest winters in recent memory, scientists and energy analysts have reported a surprising twist: greenhouse gas emissions are rising, even as policymakers and businesses strive for cleaner energy. Two main culprits have emerged: the extreme winter weather and the nation’s rapidly expanding data center industry. Together, they are putting unprecedented pressure on the power grid and contributing to emissions that could threaten the country’s climate goals. Cold Weather: More Than Just Frostbite During particularly cold periods, heating demand spikes across homes, businesses, and public facilities. Natural gas, oil, and electricity consumption all surge, forcing utilities to ramp up fossil fuel–based power generation. In December 2025 alone, studies indicate that cold snaps in the Midwest and Northeast increased emissions by several million metric tons compared to typical winter months. Heating buildings, operating infrastructure, and maintaining transportation networks in frigid conditions all contribute to this temporary yet significant rise in carbon output. While renewable energy is part of the mix, its capacity often cannot scale up quickly enough to meet sudden winter demand, leading to greater reliance on coal and natural gas plants. Data Centres: Hidden Energy Guzzlers Alongside the weather, America’s booming digital economy is playing a surprisingly large role in greenhouse gas emissions. Data centers — the massive facilities housing servers for cloud computing, social media, financial services, and artificial intelligence — consume enormous amounts of electricity, much of it still derived from fossil fuels. Recent estimates suggest that U.S. data centers alone account for approximately 2% of national electricity usage, a figure that grows steadily as more companies shift workloads to the cloud and deploy AI-heavy applications. Winter amplifies the problem. Cold weather can strain cooling systems, ironically increasing energy consumption despite the ambient chill. Some older or less efficient data centers require extra heating for sensitive equipment, while modern high-density servers generate enormous heat that must be offset with energy-intensive cooling systems. The Combined Effect: Higher Emissions When extreme cold meets high-demand data infrastructure, the result is a spike in greenhouse gas emissions. Utilities often have to turn on fossil fuel plants that are cheaper but more polluting to meet sudden energy surges. Energy analysts note that these emissions are not limited to winter months. The trend reflects a structural challenge: as America’s digital footprint expands, the electricity demand from data centers and tech infrastructure continues to climb, creating year-round pressure on the grid. Regional Impacts Some regions feel the effects more acutely than others: Northeast and Midwest: Cold weather spikes heating demand, and older grid infrastructure struggles to balance load. West Coast: High-tech hubs like Silicon Valley and Seattle have dense clusters of data centers, which already stress electricity supply during peak periods. Southern states: Data centers require constant cooling even in winter, adding to emissions from local power plants. For residents, this means higher energy bills and a larger carbon footprint, even if personal consumption habits haven’t changed significantly. Industry Response Data center operators are aware of the problem and are implementing energy efficiency measures: Advanced cooling techniques, such as liquid cooling and free-air economizers, reduce electricity use. On-site renewable energy, like solar arrays or partnerships with green energy providers, offsets emissions. AI-powered energy management optimizes server load and cooling systems, reducing unnecessary power draw. Despite these efforts, analysts warn that the scale of America’s digital infrastructure means emissions will continue to rise unless broader changes occur at the grid level and policy incentives align. Policy Implications Policymakers face a difficult balancing act. The need for digital services and economic growth must coexist with climate objectives: Incentives for clean electricity adoption in data centers Grid modernization to integrate more renewables and improve load balancing Regulations promoting energy-efficient construction and cooling technologies Consideration of carbon pricing or emissions caps for high-intensity electricity users Experts argue that without systemic reform, temporary spikes from winter weather and data centers could become permanent contributors to U.S. greenhouse gas totals, jeopardizing targets set under the Inflation Reduction Act and international climate commitments. Looking Ahead: Solutions and Innovations The challenge is both technological and societal. To curb emissions: Grid-level improvements: Modernizing infrastructure allows more renewables and reduces reliance on fossil-fuel peaker plants during cold snaps. Energy storage: Batteries and other storage solutions help bridge the gap between intermittent renewables and peak demand. Smart data centers: Continued innovation in cooling, load management, and AI can significantly reduce energy consumption. Public awareness: Encouraging energy-conscious behavior, even in winter, helps reduce pressure on the grid. Some cities and states are already piloting “green data districts”, where clusters of data centers are powered entirely by clean energy and designed to operate efficiently even in extreme weather. Why It Matters Rising greenhouse gas emissions from cold weather and data centers are more than just statistics. They: Contribute to climate change, worsening storms, droughts, and heatwaves. Highlight the hidden environmental cost of our digital lifestyle. Influence energy policy, infrastructure investment, and economic planning. Show that resilient, clean energy solutions are essential for both public welfare and environmental sustainability. In other words, while the winter chill may be temporary, the emissions problem tied to digital infrastructure is a long-term challenge. Conclusion The U.S. faces a complex confluence of factors driving greenhouse gas emissions: extreme winter weather and the rapid growth of energy-hungry data centers. Addressing these issues requires coordinated action from governments, utilities, tech companies, and individuals. Efficiency measures, renewable energy adoption, and smarter grid management are essential tools. As America continues to digitize and experience extreme weather events, understanding and mitigating these hidden sources of emissions is critical — not just for meeting climate goals, but for ensuring a sustainable future for all.
By Muhammad Hassanabout a month ago in The Swamp
The "Frankenstein" Problem: Why Your Random AI Tools Are Killing Productivity in 2026
In early 2024, the mandate for every CEO was simple: “Get us some AI.” It didn’t matter what it was, a GPT-4 wrapper for the marketing team, an automated transcription tool for the sales reps, or a mid-tier chatbot for customer service. If it had "AI" in the name, we bought it.
By ViitorCloud Technologiesabout a month ago in The Swamp
